Very sweet label! So far so good!

Nice:)

I really like the flag in the background. Way to be patriotic Blair! We all appreciate it.

That’s hot, great graphics……all the more enticing

Blair’s and fireworks…doesn’t get any better than that!

eman on 5/20/2006 at 12:00 am said:

Blair’s and fireworks…doesn’t get any better than that!

Well, maybe if the hand was actually exploding. Flesh and bone flying everywhere.

Tracy C on 5/20/2006 at 12:03 am said:

Well, maybe if the hand was actually exploding. Flesh and bone flying everywhere.

we try not to think about that being in the fireworks trade and all

I see your point. But it’s always on your mind though isn’t it eman. Remember kids, “saftey first”..

Tracy C on 5/20/2006 at 12:11 am said:

I see your point. But it’s always on your mind though isn’t it eman. Remember kids, “saftey first”..

Yeah, I had to retire from shooting the shows now that the baby is almost here. Sux, but it makes sence. Just means more backyard fireworks!!!

Yep! Time to be a responsible dad.

Fire in the hole!

Yikes! I didn’t mean anything bad.

I still think this is cool how Blair has made these one of 500 and not ending in ’99′. Imagine whoever gets the #500 will know that they have the last of these reserves and also that it is the first (probably anyway) ending in ’00′. First of the lasts in a a way

Does anyone know if Blair sold the #1 and #500 for more? I noticed that the last few reserves that have come out have not been done in this way

NICE label tho. The red white and blue could also be taken as the union jack, but the background tells all

loco luna brian on 5/19/2006 at 11:20 pm said:

I really like the flag in the background. Way to be patriotic Blair! We all appreciate it.

Tracy C on 5/20/2006 at 12:19 am said:

Yep! Time to be a responsible dad.

Fire in the hole!

Im not taking that one out of context Tracy

chrisk on 5/20/2006 at 8:08 am said:

Im not taking that one out of context Tracy

I knew you wouldn’t Chris. You’re a nice guy. It’s all of those other dirty minded chileheads that would take it the wrong way.

Tracy C on 5/20/2006 at 8:15 am said:

I knew you wouldn’t Chris. You’re a nice guy. It’s all of those other dirty minded chileheads that would take it the wrong way.

There are none of thoes here…right?

Tracy C on 5/20/2006 at 8:15 am said:

I knew you wouldn’t Chris. You’re a nice guy. It’s all of those other dirty minded chileheads that would take it the wrong way.

eman on 5/20/2006 at 8:37 am said:

There are none of thoes here…right?

I really dont know eman?

Just wondering but because the title of this says Firecracker 2006 does that mean there has been a previous firecracker?

MattUK on 5/20/2006 at 3:31 pm said:

Just wondering but because the title of this says Firecracker 2006 does that mean there has been a previous firecracker?

nope

however he (Blair) might like to do an ’07 down the road depending on the popularity. One never knows.

Or it could be another mistake in the title. You’ll notice in the title of the Divinci Code thread, it says primer, not premier

Ryan on 5/20/2006 at 5:11 pm said:

Or it could be another mistake in the title. You’ll notice in the title of the Divinci Code thread, it says primer, not premier

No mistake at all Ryan. ‘Primer’ is exactly what was intended and what the post was. It was something intended to get you ready in an introductory way for the film, with a hot sauce twist of course:)

loco luna brian on 5/20/2006 at 6:07 pm said:

No mistake at all Ryan. ‘Primer’ is exactly what was intended and what the post was. It was something intended to get you ready in an introductory way for the film, with a hot sauce twist of course:)

Ok, that makes sense. Thanks for the clarification.

Ryan on 5/20/2006 at 10:07 pm said:

Ok, that makes sense. Thanks for the clarification.

Any time, my friend.

“. LESS THAN 15 REMAIN”

$200 each now

Glad I got in on time. I ordered some other stuff with it so I cannot wait!!