WordPress database error: [You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near 'WHERE comment_date > FROM_UNIXTIME(1327614308) AND comment_post_ID = 1209 AND co' at line 1]
SELECT comment_date FROM WHERE comment_date > FROM_UNIXTIME(1327614308) AND comment_post_ID = 1209 AND comment_approved = '1' ORDER BY comment_date DESC LIMIT 1


Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/content/h/o/t/hotsauceblog/html/wp-includes/wp-db.php:958) in /home/content/h/o/t/hotsauceblog/html/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8
Comments on: Original Juan Rebuttal http://www.hotsauceblog.com/hotsaucearchives/original-juan-rebuttal/ Wed, 19 Aug 2009 20:38:24 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1 By: Ryan@angrypepper http://www.hotsauceblog.com/hotsaucearchives/original-juan-rebuttal/comment-page-1/#comment-48795 Ryan@angrypepper Sun, 06 Aug 2006 02:26:34 +0000 http://www.hotsauceblog.com/hotsaucearchives/original-juan-rebuttal/#comment-48795 [Comment ID #48787 Quote] Well, I was thinking more along the lines of perpetuatiing a little white lie for some excitement, but that may fall under defamation of character (spelling). But I'll keep that decency act thing in mind :twisted: You do a good job of moderating.

Nick Lindauer on 8/5/2006 at 9:52 pm said:

Ha ha – well according to the 1996 Communications Decency Act: webmasters are exempt from responsibility for displaying other’s comments (so no legal worries there)

Don’t worry, I always make sure I’m in the clear before anything goes on the HSB (to the best of my ability ) :lol:

Well, I was thinking more along the lines of perpetuatiing a little white lie for some excitement, but that may fall under defamation of character (spelling). But I’ll keep that decency act thing in mind :twisted: You do a good job of moderating.

]]> By: Nick Lindauer http://www.hotsauceblog.com/hotsaucearchives/original-juan-rebuttal/comment-page-1/#comment-48787 Nick Lindauer Sun, 06 Aug 2006 01:52:59 +0000 http://www.hotsauceblog.com/hotsaucearchives/original-juan-rebuttal/#comment-48787 [Comment ID #48783 Quote] Ha ha - well according to the 1996 Communications Decency Act: webmasters are exempt from responsibility for displaying other's comments (so no legal worries there) Don't worry, I always make sure I'm in the clear before anything goes on the HSB (to the best of my ability ) :lol:

Ryan@angrypepper on 8/5/2006 at 9:37 pm said:

Damn Nick, you could have totally run with this and made things REALLY interesting, but i suppose you’re trying to avoid lawsuits and such. So I’ll accept the truth for now :-P

Ha ha – well according to the 1996 Communications Decency Act: webmasters are exempt from responsibility for displaying other’s comments (so no legal worries there)

Don’t worry, I always make sure I’m in the clear before anything goes on the HSB (to the best of my ability ) :lol:

]]> By: Ryan@angrypepper http://www.hotsauceblog.com/hotsaucearchives/original-juan-rebuttal/comment-page-1/#comment-48783 Ryan@angrypepper Sun, 06 Aug 2006 01:37:36 +0000 http://www.hotsauceblog.com/hotsaucearchives/original-juan-rebuttal/#comment-48783 [Comment ID #48781 Quote] Damn Nick, you could have totally run with this and made things REALLY interesting, but i suppose you're trying to avoid lawsuits and such. So I'll accept the truth for now :-P

Nick Lindauer on 8/5/2006 at 9:15 pm said:

Ha ha – nope, just clicked the wrong button (marked it private) and since I could see it, I didn’t figure out right away why everyone else couldn’t see it.

Damn Nick, you could have totally run with this and made things REALLY interesting, but i suppose you’re trying to avoid lawsuits and such. So I’ll accept the truth for now :-P

]]> By: Nick Lindauer http://www.hotsauceblog.com/hotsaucearchives/original-juan-rebuttal/comment-page-1/#comment-48781 Nick Lindauer Sun, 06 Aug 2006 01:15:35 +0000 http://www.hotsauceblog.com/hotsaucearchives/original-juan-rebuttal/#comment-48781 [Comment ID #48780 Quote] Ha ha - nope, just clicked the wrong button (marked it private) and since I could see it, I didn't figure out right away why everyone else couldn't see it.

Ryan@angrypepper on 8/5/2006 at 9:14 pm said:

Wasn’t there this morning…did OJ threaten to stop selling to yu if you didn’t pull it, or at least wait for the rebutle?

Ha ha – nope, just clicked the wrong button (marked it private) and since I could see it, I didn’t figure out right away why everyone else couldn’t see it.

]]> By: Ryan@angrypepper http://www.hotsauceblog.com/hotsaucearchives/original-juan-rebuttal/comment-page-1/#comment-48780 Ryan@angrypepper Sun, 06 Aug 2006 01:14:00 +0000 http://www.hotsauceblog.com/hotsaucearchives/original-juan-rebuttal/#comment-48780 [Comment ID #48776 Quote] Wasn't there this morning...did OJ threaten to stop selling to yu if you didn't pull it, or at least wait for the rebutle?

Nick Lindauer on 8/5/2006 at 9:01 pm said:

It’s there still

Wasn’t there this morning…did OJ threaten to stop selling to yu if you didn’t pull it, or at least wait for the rebutle?

]]> By: Nick Lindauer http://www.hotsauceblog.com/hotsaucearchives/original-juan-rebuttal/comment-page-1/#comment-48776 Nick Lindauer Sun, 06 Aug 2006 01:01:12 +0000 http://www.hotsauceblog.com/hotsaucearchives/original-juan-rebuttal/#comment-48776 [Comment ID #48771 Quote] It's there still

locolunabrian on 8/5/2006 at 8:08 pm said:

The only question is: this is the rebutal to what? The original item was removed.

It’s there still

]]> By: Ryan@angrypepper http://www.hotsauceblog.com/hotsaucearchives/original-juan-rebuttal/comment-page-1/#comment-48773 Ryan@angrypepper Sun, 06 Aug 2006 00:26:21 +0000 http://www.hotsauceblog.com/hotsaucearchives/original-juan-rebuttal/#comment-48773 As I stated in the Cafe Tequila press release, its a situation of CYOA (Cover Your Own Ass). Not taking sides on this, but it would seem that Cafe Tequila didn't cover their ass in the negotiations, and OJ did. Don't have any clue what happened in past aquisitions, don't care. I have to deal with crap like this day in and day out. As Mr. Polo Sr. said, "That courts will be the judge". Sure I root for the underdog, but hey, there is a chain of events and this is the result of whatever happened in the beginning. Guess we'll have to wait and see how it ends <b>ON WITH THE SLINGING OF CARP!</b> As I stated in the Cafe Tequila press release, its a situation of CYOA (Cover Your Own Ass). Not taking sides on this, but it would seem that Cafe Tequila didn’t cover their ass in the negotiations, and OJ did. Don’t have any clue what happened in past aquisitions, don’t care. I have to deal with crap like this day in and day out. As Mr. Polo Sr. said, “That courts will be the judge”. Sure I root for the underdog, but hey, there is a chain of events and this is the result of whatever happened in the beginning. Guess we’ll have to wait and see how it ends ON WITH THE SLINGING OF CARP!

]]> By: locolunabrian http://www.hotsauceblog.com/hotsaucearchives/original-juan-rebuttal/comment-page-1/#comment-48771 locolunabrian Sun, 06 Aug 2006 00:08:37 +0000 http://www.hotsauceblog.com/hotsaucearchives/original-juan-rebuttal/#comment-48771 The only question is: this is the rebutal to what? The original item was removed. The only question is: this is the rebutal to what? The original item was removed.

]]> By: Bret http://www.hotsauceblog.com/hotsaucearchives/original-juan-rebuttal/comment-page-1/#comment-48764 Bret Sat, 05 Aug 2006 22:23:39 +0000 http://www.hotsauceblog.com/hotsaucearchives/original-juan-rebuttal/#comment-48764 Thanks Nick. I have met Joe many times. I'm glad he sent you this note. Thanks Nick. I have met Joe many times. I’m glad he sent you this note.

]]>