Received mine March 30 - signed and mailed to pmac March 30th.

Cardiff, UK. They will be leaving me sadly tomorrow though (until I see one return, bottled) back to Nick in New York

I’ve received the second batch - once again in Cardiff, UK.

MattUK on 4/22/2006 at 9:49 am said:

I’ve received the second batch - once again in Cardiff, UK.

Where’s the first batch!

I think it seems to be a little slow getting around! ha!

huvason on 4/22/2006 at 11:51 am said:

Where’s the first batch!

the first batch should be back in America as I sent them back to Nick.

The 2nd batch now has 6 signatures

Anthony on 3/31/2006 at 12:28 pm said:

Received mine March 30 - signed and mailed to pmac March 30th.

I got the load from Aaron, but i thought it was a lot longer ago than that, times fly when you are having fun I sent the batch back to Nick as requested the day after I received them. I assume he has them by now, although I have not seen (head) any confirmation.

Who all got in on this first run?

pmac on 4/22/2006 at 2:44 pm said:

I got the load from Aaron, but i thought it was a lot longer ago than that, times fly when you are having fun I sent the batch back to Nick as requested the day after I received them. I assume he has them by now, although I have not seen (head) any confirmation.

I think that I might have that batch now. When you had these that I have now, I had the other set which are now back in the US

Scott on 4/22/2006 at 3:07 pm said:

Who all got in on this first run?

Dunno who all was in on the whole thing, but nNick sent them out in 2 seperate bunches. One to EU one to CDA getting the foreigners taken care of first.
Then i think he will be sending them out to the USA after they all have the EU and CDA signatues on them. only 2 in CDA i think. The labels had 4 signatures once I finnished them and sent back to Nick. only 2 were CDA the others were from the guys that made the labels i think. Dan@BLP and someone else I forget who (sorry). But I thnk his partner possibly.

It has been almost two months now since they were sent out and only two people have posted where they’ve arrived and where they are going next. I hope the packages are ok. I recently took part in a project that took just over a week to reach 4 people on opposite ends of the country…kinda makes me wonder

Ryan on 4/22/2006 at 3:53 pm said:

It has been almost two months now since they were sent out and only two people have posted where they’ve arrived and where they are going next. I hope the packages are ok. I recently took part in a project that took just over a week to reach 4 people on opposite ends of the country…kinda makes me wonder

Ryan, isn’t that why they call it “Snail Mail”

Ryan on 4/22/2006 at 3:53 pm said:

It has been almost two months now since they were sent out and only two people have posted where they’ve arrived and where they are going next. I hope the packages are ok. I recently took part in a project that took just over a week to reach 4 people on opposite ends of the country…kinda makes me wonder

Well Aaron had them March 30th that was 22 days ago(Aaron was the first Canadian of 2 to get them), since then they have been to me then back to another country (getting into US is harder then sending from with customs). AND now MattUK says he has them in the UK. I think that is pretty good considering the foreigners ar all almost done.

It seems there is another Aaron. I must find a different name I guess! haha

Aaron, Anthony …close enough LOL!!!

Ooops sorry Aaron and anthony!

pmac on 4/22/2006 at 4:06 pm said:

Well Aaron had them March 30th that was 22 days ago(Aaron was the first Canadian of 2 to get them), since then they have been to me then back to another country (getting into US is harder then sending from with customs). AND now MattUK says he has them in the UK. I think that is pretty good considering the foreigners ar all almost done.

All that in just under a month. I think the almost 2 months is a little high. But regardless, its like watching a pot of boiling water :), it will all fly once they are back to the USA though you watch

pmac on 4/22/2006 at 4:25 pm said:

Aaron, Anthony …close enough LOL!!!

Ooops sorry Aaron and anthony!

Now I am not so confused. I was wondering who this other Aaron was you spoke of!! All straight now

Vic on 4/22/2006 at 4:04 pm said:

Ryan, isn’t that why they call it “Snail Mail”

You’d think people would send it priorty mail (2-3 days), but I guess some people prefer the cheapest route…not that priotity costs that much for such a light weight package.

Who says it isnt priority. You are doing overseas and cross border stuff.
You have to assume people know how to mail and that you saying that is just because you like to be confrontational. You are the primary reason people get into it here. It would be nice to see some positive from you once in a while Ryan.
nuff said.

I just got the envelope from Anthony, all sighned, it will be mailed tomorrow “Priority” or express of some sort.

Regards,

pmac

Anthony on 3/31/2006 at 12:28 pm said:

Received mine March 30 - signed and mailed to pmac March 30th.

Where? It will be interesting to see all the travels:)

pmac, if you get this, send me an e-mail, I deleted a bunch of e-mails and yours was in it and I hadn’t saved your address. I’ve got #s together for you.
Thanks,
MR

UPDATE The “Ultimate Blog Sauce” Labels are now in my posession. Will have them mailed to the next person on the list on Monday.

Looks like I got the east coast labels. All signed to go out Priority Mail to the next on the list.

Sounds like things are beginning to move along nicely!

The set of labels that I had are now on their way to Daniel in CA. Should be there in a few days!

Ryan@angrypepper on 6/5/2006 at 4:15 pm said:

The set of labels that I had are now on their way to Daniel in CA. Should be there in a few days!

should have set-up a frappr map for the labels:-)

chrisk on 6/5/2006 at 4:39 pm said:

should have set-up a frappr map for the labels:-)

Now THAT is a great idea! Make it so, sir!

Ryan@angrypepper on 6/5/2006 at 4:15 pm said:

The set of labels that I had are now on their way to Daniel in CA. Should be there in a few days!

I got the labels today June 8th,ill sign in an hour, and will personally deliver them to Clint tomorrow. Wheres that frapper map. im impatient.

make that 9th i guess. my computers date is off =(

oh never mind, got it, servers on the east coast. lol 8th it is again, go computer =)

Daniel on 6/9/2006 at 12:44 am said:

I got the labels today June 8th,ill sign in an hour, and will personally deliver them to Clint tomorrow. Wheres that frapper map. im impatient.

Guess we should work on that

I was finally able to get to the post office and got the package. They will be signed and sent out Monday to the next person on the list.

thakswset on 6/15/2006 at 8:43 pm said:

I was finally able to get to the post office and got the package. They will be signed and sent out Monday to the next person on the list.

Sweet!

Clinton now has the labels, on my set.

Sending lables via snail mail to Mr. Robert Bates.

Mrs Huvason just called - a set has landed on the East Coast. Will sign and and get out tomorrow.

huvason on 6/21/2006 at 3:49 pm said:

Mrs Huvason just called - a set has landed on the East Coast. Will sign and and get out tomorrow.

Will sign….

sorry.

huvason on 6/21/2006 at 3:49 pm said:

Mrs Huvason just called - a set has landed on the East Coast. Will sign and and get out tomorrow.

huvason on 6/21/2006 at 3:50 pm said:

Will sign….

sorry.

No prob huvason, junior fixed it

chrisk on 6/21/2006 at 4:24 pm said:

No prob huvason, junior fixed it

Thanx “Junior”

Labels are signed and on their way - to guess who. JUNIOR! Sent USPS Priority mail, will be there in two days (I would say probably tomorrow, but your roads aren’t paved over where you live - right? )

Horses travel quite well on dirt and gravel, so it should be tomorrow…lol

I will get these signed and sent back out ASAP!

chrisk on 6/22/2006 at 10:33 am said:

Horses travel quite well on dirt and gravel, so it should be tomorrow…lol

I will get these signed and sent back out ASAP!

Not when The Huvason dropped caltrops all over the road, so as to make it look like you are the saboteur. Huvason probably pinned all the half-signed labels on Mad during the night.

not to say who *cough*, but I think with Huvason’s mail, the package is back on “track”. Somebody went down on the mailing label list instead of following the address printout…

thakswset on 6/22/2006 at 4:17 pm said:

not to say who *cough*, but I think with Huvason’s mail, the package is back on “track”. Somebody went down on the mailing label list instead of following the address printout…

LOL - All is good now thakswet! I wasn’t going to mention it, but there was a shipping error made

clint on 6/21/2006 at 3:40 pm said:

Sending lables via snail mail to Mr. Robert Bates.

Got em’….going out to adam today

Just signed the set that I received here in NC..will be shipping out via priority mail to DK in SC.

Sounds like they are headed south! Hey Tracy you didn’t sign on the inside of the label did you? That’s my spot

Vic on 6/29/2006 at 9:28 pm said:

Sounds like they are headed south! Hey Tracy you didn’t sign on the inside of the label did you? That’s my spot

Nope, I saved that spot for you.
I actually signed the white piece of paper on the back of the label.

Tracy C on 6/29/2006 at 9:32 pm said:

Nope, I saved that spot for you.
I actually signed the white piece of paper on the back of the label.

Don’t lie - I pulled all that white stuff off and threw it out. It doubled the weight of the package and cost more to ship! Now the package is much lighter

huvason on 6/29/2006 at 10:42 pm said:

Don’t lie - I pulled all that white stuff off and threw it out. It doubled the weight of the package and cost more to ship! Now the package is much lighter

I thought something was a bit odd when you sent em to me

huvason on 6/29/2006 at 10:42 pm said:

Don’t lie - I pulled all that white stuff off and threw it out. It doubled the weight of the package and cost more to ship! Now the package is much lighter

Oh I see. So that explains the sticky stuff on the back of the labels.

Tracy C on 6/30/2006 at 7:22 am said:

Oh I see. So that explains the sticky stuff on the back of the labels.

If you are referring to the glue, then yes. If not, then you will need to ask Chris

huvason on 6/30/2006 at 7:56 am said:

If you are referring to the glue, then yes. If not, then you will need to ask Chris

Chris- I think you have some explaining to do….

huvason on 6/30/2006 at 7:56 am said:

If you are referring to the glue, then yes. If not, then you will need to ask Chris

Vic on 6/30/2006 at 10:00 am said:

Chris- I think you have some explaining to do….

Yes, I sent them to Tracy after receiving them from huvason.

Sorry, it was that whole pmac and after the handshake thing

NO, but
I did have to wear latex gloves though when I handled them. It wasnt pretty. I wasnt going to mention that, but since it is out in the open now.

Huv, who sent them to you?

Vic on 6/30/2006 at 10:00 am said:

Chris- I think you have some explaining to do….

No worries mates!! I think that I’ve found a solution to the sticky problem..I’ll let ya know as soon as the dishwasher stops!

Tracy C on 6/30/2006 at 1:28 pm said:

No worries mates!! I think that I’ve found a solution to the sticky problem..I’ll let ya know as soon as the dishwasher stops!

Good thinking Tracy!

The labels will have the pre-washed look now

Tracy C on 6/30/2006 at 1:28 pm said:

No worries mates!! I think that I’ve found a solution to the sticky problem..I’ll let ya know as soon as the dishwasher stops!

Excellent idea. They had all that ink on them anyway

chrisk on 6/30/2006 at 3:06 pm said:

Good thinking Tracy!

The labels will have the pre-washed look now

huvason on 6/30/2006 at 3:15 pm said:

Excellent idea. They had all that ink on them anyway

Well bad news. The ink didn’t wash off, they’re still sticky, and now WET as well. I’ll toss ‘em in the dryer with my undies to solve the wetness problem.

I’m on the map.

OK … the west to east labels have reached Texas. I’m mailing them out today to ….. looks like Ryan is next on the list.

Got the labels today from TracyC, east to west set. Signed and repackaged for mailing to next on the list. Scott, your next.

Tracy, nice artwork, would have looked good on the label !

DK on 7/7/2006 at 8:17 pm said:

Got the labels today from TracyC, east to west set. Signed and repackaged for mailing to next on the list. Scott, your next.

Tracy, nice artwork, would have looked good on the label !

BlaaaaaHaaaahaaa!! Yer trying to get me in trouble aren’t ya DK?

Tracy C on 7/8/2006 at 6:48 pm said:

BlaaaaaHaaaahaaa!! Yer trying to get me in trouble aren’t ya DK?

Nah! Just having some fun! I can’t wait ’til these labels get back to Nick. It will be a great addition to the collection for sure. I scanned the label mainly so I have a record of who was on it when I got it. Gonna do the same with the second set. Figured it would look good framed and hanging on the wall. Hopefully, the west to east set will have everyone that wasn’t on the east to west, so I will have everyone on the two pics when I frame it.

DK, I’m just thankful that you only showed the label with the drawing of my pic on it and not the one with the drawing that I did of Nick.

Tracy C on 7/8/2006 at 9:07 pm said:

DK, I’m just thankful that you only showed the label with the drawing of my pic on it and not the one with the drawing that I did of Nick.

That one may get this thread “locked”, if it’s the one I’m thinking of.

DK on 7/7/2006 at 8:17 pm said:

Got the labels today from TracyC, east to west set. Signed and repackaged for mailing to next on the list. Scott, your next.

Tracy, nice artwork, would have looked good on the label !

SWEEEEEEEET!!!!

It’ll be easy to tell if you receive an east-west, or a west-east label when these are completed and sent out to each individual due to the location of the signatures.

Ryan@angrypepper on 7/9/2006 at 11:43 am said:

It’ll be easy to tell if you receive an east-west, or a west-east label when these are completed and sent out to each individual due to the location of the signatures.

Yep, I was thinking that as well. Although all will be individual as the sigs are made on each label with no copies being made, the east-west and west-east versions will be different as well. So this is gonna turn out like the different wax combos on the FC 500’s, same labels, just different visually.

Scott on 7/9/2006 at 8:58 am said:

SWEEEEEEEET!!!!

OK Scott, keep your eye out for the big brown truck. You should see it on Wednesday.

Already looking.

Got the labels today from Adam. Already signed them all, and I’m sending them out to Brian (in McKinney, TX) today. Very cool!

On a side note: Not to be stupid, but I think we really ought to just keep the signatures limited to our name instead of writing stuff like “(insert name) loves boobs” or “(insert name) has man boobs”, etc, on the labels…..

Ryan Bell on 7/11/2006 at 10:42 am said:

Got the labels today from Adam. Already signed them all, and I’m sending them out to Brian (in McKinney, TX) today. Very cool!

On a side note: Not to be stupid, but I think we really ought to just keep the signatures limited to our name instead of writing stuff like “(insert name) loves boobs” or “(insert name) has man boobs”, etc, on the labels…..

Well Tracy, looks like we started something. Guess I shouln’t have posted the pic.

Seriously, I hope everyone realized my pic was photochopped, There was no drawing on the label. IT WAS A JOKE! (As I hope Ryan’s post is!)

Let’s keep my man-boobs out of this.

My post isn’t a joke. I’m holding the labels now. It’s on there.

Ryan Bell on 7/11/2006 at 12:58 pm said:

My post isn’t a joke. I’m holding the labels now. It’s on there.

I was really hoping you were kidding. So much for a tasteful label.

I am totally excited, I have been anxiously awaiting the Big Brown Truck to show up with a box of labels to sign!!! Think of how many miles these babies will have traveled when its all said and done!!

Ryan Bell on 7/11/2006 at 12:58 pm said:

My post isn’t a joke. I’m holding the labels now. It’s on there.

Well that’s just lame. All the time and money that’s going into this and somebody is writing all over the labels?

I saw the “fake” pic and laughed cause it was funny that it wasn’t the real labels. Screwing the real labels up with lame crap is wrong.

Sharpe marker can be removed pretty eaisily. Just gotta be carefull with the lables.

Ryan Bell on 7/11/2006 at 10:42 am said:

Got the labels today from Adam. Already signed them all, and I’m sending them out to Brian (in McKinney, TX) today. Very cool!

On a side note: Not to be stupid, but I think we really ought to just keep the signatures limited to our name instead of writing stuff like “(insert name) loves boobs” or “(insert name) has man boobs”, etc, on the labels…..

I couldn’t agree more. This was a super idea, it is just ridiculous that someone would basically ruin these labels by doing that.

It should be easy to figure out who did it. I agree, it definitely lame.

They thought it would be “cute” to make every signature different by writing stuff after it like “loves boobs”, “is a hottie”, etc. I really thought most people had more taste than this.

If anyone decides to dissent (which it doesn’t look like is going to happen), by saying “lighten up” or something……oh contrare. Of course it’s supposed to be fun. There’s also integrity involved - as with anything - and it really defeats a lot of hard work to make something special when you try to draw attention to yourself and be “cute” (which it’s not at all) by writing something ridiculous. It’s like signing someone’s wedding book with “Stay gay” or something and then telling them to “lighten up”. There is appropriate humor, and inappropriate humor. …and when it screws up the integrity of someone else’s work (at the expense of everyone else as well), it’s inappropriate.

Anyway, just thought I’d share.

Ryan Bell on 7/11/2006 at 3:20 pm said:

They thought it would be “cute” to make every signature different by writing stuff after it like “loves boobs”, “is a hottie”, etc. I really thought most people had more taste than this.

If anyone decides to dissent (which it doesn’t look like is going to happen), by saying “lighten up” or something……oh contrare. Of course it’s supposed to be fun. There’s also integrity involved - as with anything - and it really defeats a lot of hard work to make something special when you try to draw attention to yourself and be “cute” (which it’s not at all) by writing something ridiculous. It’s like signing someone’s wedding book with “Stay gay” or something and then telling them to “lighten up”. There is appropriate humor, and inappropriate humor. …and when it screws up the integrity of someone else’s work (at the expense of everyone else as well), it’s inappropriate.

Anyway, just thought I’d share.

Very well put.

I was the one who sent it to Ryan, and I received it from someone named Dave, I think.

I must have been completely blind because I never even looked at the labels except for where I write my first name in the upper left.

This whole thing is confusing me because I never saw anything about boobs.

It was on the upper right side, and the person who did has posted in this thread.

Nick Lindauer on 7/11/2006 at 3:36 pm said:

It’s easy enough to track down, who sent the labels to you Ryan?

Is it every label in that set or just a few?

Just a few. He signed every label differently. Some have question marks after them, arrows pointing to them, etc……and a few have phrases like the ones I mentioned. If no one cares, I don’t mind saying who it was. I don’t want everyone to hate me for pointing this out, but I just thought it was a little tasteless, that’s all.

Nick Lindauer on 7/11/2006 at 3:36 pm said:

It’s easy enough to track down, who sent the labels to you Ryan?

Is it every label in that set or just a few?

Nick, if my post of the label pic influenced this in any way I am truly sorry and owe an apology. I thought I made it clear that it was not real, but looking back at it, maybe it wasn’t so clear after all. Again, if this stemmed from my antics, then I’ll take the heat. Guess I’ll have to show up for Defcon day to take my flogging.

But if it wasn’t my fault, then nevermind.

Ryan Bell on 7/11/2006 at 3:50 pm said:

Just a few. He signed every label differently. Some have question marks after them, arrows pointing to them, etc……and a few have phrases like the ones I mentioned. If no one cares, I don’t mind saying who it was. I don’t want everyone to hate me for pointing this out, but I just thought it was a little tasteless, that’s all.

WTF!…
sorry I have nothing else to say except maybe we should have been a bit more careful on the original “who’s in” list.

Nick Lindauer on 7/11/2006 at 3:58 pm said:

Ryan - If you haven’t sent out the labels yet, remove the few that are wronged and send them back to me. Also, email me the name of the offender and I’ll handle it - as much as I am into public floggings, I’d rather not have the whole crew after one person.

Well, if they updated the frappr map, it wont be hard to tell who they are.

“as much as I am into public floggings, I’d rather not have the whole crew after one person.”

Yeah, but I might…

Kidding Nick, just kidding

Nick Lindauer on 7/11/2006 at 3:58 pm said:

Ryan - If you haven’t sent out the labels yet, remove the few that are wronged and send them back to me. Also, email me the name of the offender and I’ll handle it - as much as I am into public floggings, I’d rather not have the whole crew after one person.

Very nicely done Nick…..I am sure it will come out sooner or later though.

Nick Lindauer on 7/11/2006 at 3:58 pm said:

Ryan - If you haven’t sent out the labels yet, remove the few that are wronged and send them back to me. Also, email me the name of the offender and I’ll handle it - as much as I am into public floggings, I’d rather not have the whole crew after one person.

But public floggings are so cool.

either way, the culprit owes at least you an apology….

Someone could let me know who it is…I have ways of dealing with people out of the public eye

It’ll be rather obvious seeing that it’s the only name that varies with each label.

Ryan Bell on 7/11/2006 at 5:56 pm said:

It’ll be rather obvious seeing that it’s the only name that varies with each label.

I made sure mine were exactly he same (or tried to) so that all the labels would be the same and no-one would get something different from another. I had them ages ago now tho

It was me i admit it

Ok ok it wasn’t but I feel so bad the dink that did whatever is done will not be welcome here I think. Too funny. It takes just one kid/jackolantern to get the community in an uproar. I think it was one of you guys. Well doesn’t that narrow it down. OK I am making light a situation that has upset several/most of the bloggers, and I am sure as others involved in this venture find out as they log in there will be more public display of disappointment.
Thankfully if there are only a few messed up, and you can figure out who it was, then one of the labels doesnt need a home. I.E. the offender does not get one. But to be honest they probably do not care either.
We could cut him with a thousand paper cuts (using cardboard) and rub raw Hab mash into the little wounds, I think I know cough*Freeze*cough someone that would be able to supply a few billion habs cough*jimc*cough to make the raw Hab mash with. But hey thats just a thought. I’m not sayin’!!!…I’m just saying is all.

Nick Lindauer on 7/11/2006 at 6:08 pm said:

I’d say they owe everyone in on it an apology

Well, why not have this person make a public apology, and it they don’t, they don’t get a bottle